Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and state officials speak at their daily press conference on May 21, 2020 | Photo: Illinois Information Service.

(The Center Square) – A judge’s ruling ending Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s executive orders limiting businesses and individual movements applies to everyone, according to the courts. But it’s unclear when the issue will finally be resolved.

Just before the Independence Day holiday weekend, state Rep. Darren Bailey, R-Xenia, stepped out of a courtroom with wins against the governor. Bailey challenged Pritzker’s authority to extend COVID-19 related restrictions beyond April 9.

Pritzker declared a statewide disaster because of the pandemic on March 9. He’s extended that order every 30 days. But Clay County Circuit Judge Michael McHaney ruled the governor couldn’t extend the declaration past 30 days.

McHaney also said the motion for summary judgment in Bailey’s favor shall apply to all commonly situated citizens, not just Bailey. Bailey’s attorney explained any order after April 9 related to COVID-19 is void.

[Suggested Article]  Heavy rainfall expected, isolated thunderstorms possible amid 'unseasonably' warm weather in Chicagoland area

“One of them that comes to mind with me is one of the most recent that limits the occupancy that people can have in their businesses,” DeVore said. “That’s going to as we stand here right now.”

Pritzker’s most recent order limited customer capacity at businesses depending on the industry.

Pritzker spokeswoman Emily Bittner, in a statement to the Tribune, said the governor’s executive orders were constitutional.

“Every other court – both state and federal – that has considered these exact issues has agreed with the administration that executive orders protecting Illinoisans’ health and safety are well within the governor’s constitutional authority,” Bittner said. “This includes a federal court decision earlier today.”

Kent Redfield, a longtime politics professor, said the issue really won’t be cleared up if Pritzker appeals through to the Illinois Supreme Court.

[Suggested Article]  Heavy rainfall expected, isolated thunderstorms possible amid 'unseasonably' warm weather in Chicagoland area

“It does make for a messy legal situation until these things get resolved,” Redfield said, noting it adds uncertainty and confusion into the current climate. “Ultimately what is going to happen with people’s behavior … the public gets a vote in this in terms of how they are going to behave.”

The Illinois Attorney General’s office said it is reviewing the ruling and will evaluate its options, but DeVore said the window for state government to file a stay pausing the ruling is closed.

“What that means is that, until a review in court otherwise sometime down the road, month, two, three or four, renders a ruling, the court’s order here today stands, which means there is no restrictions by the governor,” DeVore said.

DeVore said pandemic management now goes back to local county health departments.

[Suggested Article]  Heavy rainfall expected, isolated thunderstorms possible amid 'unseasonably' warm weather in Chicagoland area

“I think each individual health department has the authority that they’ve been granted by the legislative branch of the government,” DeVore said. “They can read what the authority is.”

The governor still can an appeal, which could go all the way to the state Supreme Court.