File Photo – Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker | Photo: Illinois Information Service

(The Center Square) – The ban on “assault weapons” and high-capacity magazines is back in effect in Illinois after an appeals court reversed a federal judge’s decision on Thursday.

The ban on more than 170 semi-automatic firearms and magazines over a certain capacity was enacted by Gov. J.B. Pritzker on January 10.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Judge Stephen McGlynn issued a preliminary injunction last Friday against the state, preventing it from enforcing the ban while a lawsuit continues.

Following McGlynn’s action halting enforcement of the ban, social media posts showed lines of patrons inside gun stores looking to buy items.

“Tonight is the busiest night yet!,” a Wednesday Facebook post from GAT Guns in East Dundee said. “We will halt sales and pick up at 7:30 so we can help the line of customers who are already in line! The earlier you can come in during the day the better!!!”

[Suggested Article]  Forecasters warn about three waves of wintry weather expected in northern Illinois

In the week since McGlynn’s order, gun rights advocate Todd Vandermyde said one gun store told him they have had their largest volume of sales ever.

“I was at a gun store yesterday, and he just got in a pile of firearms to restock his shelves,” Vandermyde told WMAY. “So, the gun stores, things are moving again.”

In response to the injunction, the state asked McGlynn to stay the order pending appeal.

After the judge instead scheduled briefings, the state motioned with the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene and reverse the injunction while the case plays out.

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook granted a stay on the injunction late Thursday afternoon.

“Any response to the motion for a stay must be received by the close of business on May 9, 2023,” Easterbrook wrote.

[Suggested Article]  Forecasters warn about three waves of wintry weather expected in northern Illinois

Vandermyde said the state is “stamping their feet.”

“They’re just like, ’you got it wrong and the other judges up north got it right,’” he said. “And I’m not sure that’s the appropriate tact to take in this case.”